The Tale of Two Soldiers

‘This is the tale of two soldiers who have never met and who were supposed to kill each other 75 years ago on this beach – one fighting for Fuhrer and Fatherland  – Paul Galt aged 18 on D-day; the other fighting for king and country – Harry Reid barely a year older…’

So started the Channel 4 film bringing together two men in their 90’s, one German, one British. 

The British soldier joined the Salvation Army after the Second World War. But despite being committed to forgiveness he was not sure what he’d say to the man who had been on the Normandy beach trying to kill him.

Paul Galt, the young German soldier who surrendered to an American tank crew, spent D-Day 2019 at the German War Cemetery in Normandy where the black stone crosses marked the final resting places of those vanquished. Paul’s post war life was not easy – their German village assimilated into Poland where his farming father was killed by Russian soldiers and his sister raped. Paul himself was a prison of war in Scotland where he learnt English.

We are partners together in the rebuilding of the world…

When they did meet it was Harry who greeted Paul with these words: ‘I’m so glad to see you and to hold your hand and say bless you… once we were on a different sides but we are partners together in the rebuilding of the world.’

75 years ago did Harry expect to ever meet his enemy? ‘My common sense told me that there were people very peacefully minded and their voices are so often silenced.’

Channel 4 then went on to interview two more soldiers, this time both British and asked them what young people especially should take away from this occasion. Without hesitation Dickie Forrester responded,  ‘Don’t go to war ‘coz it doesn’t get you anywhere… absolute waste of time.’

Bill Gladden responded, ‘There are lots of youngsters laying out there in the cemetery… in their nineteens and twenties killed or maimed… we don’t want that happen again.’

‘Now we are friends…’
‘We are more than that, we are brothers’

The challenges and benefits of dual-nationality

Globalisation has brought its challenges. One of those challenges is that of dual-national marriages. Falling in love with someone from a different country may make you unwelcome as a couple in either country. Sometimes, it takes years to resolve where you can live in the world, which can be especially hard on the  children involved. I am the product of a mixed family, but for me, my citizenship has made it a lot easier, possibly even a blessing. EU citizenship makes it easy for people from Member States to fall in love and live almost anywhere in Europe.

My British mother and French father taught my brothers and me the pleasures of multilingualism and travelling, as they have now worked for decades as university lecturers with backgrounds in modern languages, before later specialising in law and economics, respectively.

I first enjoyed freedom of movement as a new-born baby in 1992 when visiting relatives in northern France, an inevitability of growing up in a bilingual Franco-British household. From a young age, I was made aware that the relationship between the English and other nationalities is not always straightforward. I was pestered upon countless occasions for being ‘the French kid’ in school, despite being known as ‘the British guy’ everywhere else in the world!

My parents, on the other hand, reminded me many times of how lucky I was to be a dual national. Back then I found this hard to believe, for a variety of reasons, but I now embrace it thanks to the many opportunities that have since come my way.

I was pestered for being ‘the French kid’ in school, but ‘the British guy’ everywhere else in the world!

I learned Spanish in secondary school, and was able to pick it up quickly with my existing knowledge of the French language. I was even given the chance to put my conversational skills to the test when attending a week of work experience in a music shop in Segovia (Spain), an incident that gave me a taste for an adventurous life of living abroad. Alongside this, I began to attend extracurricular German classes in 2004.

The years flew by and I went on to study a bachelor’s degree in Modern European Languages at the University of Liverpool in 2010, aiming to increase my chances of finding work further afield at a later stage. After finding out about Brazil’s growing economy and the fast development of Portuguese-speaking nations such as Angola, I picked up Portuguese from scratch whilst studying French and Spanish at a higher level. With my previously acquired knowledge of two Latin-based languages, Portuguese came to me quite easily, despite the not-so-obvious initial difficulties in pronunciation. These languages have since functioned as a gateway for dabbling in other Latin-based languages, including Catalan, Italian and even Romanian.

Students were encouraged to partake in a two-part ‘year abroad’, an essential requirement to boost our language abilities from intermediate to advanced level, before reaching our fourth and final year of undergraduate study. I chose to teach English as a Comenius Assistant at a secondary school situated in Porto (Portugal), with financial aid from the British Council.

Once I had made my own diverse group of friends and regained confidence, life abroad became easy and enjoyable.

I then studied translation and literature on the Erasmus scheme at the Universidad de Alicante (Spain). Erasmus is an EU-funded scheme with a number of programmes, one of which provides participants with a monthly bursary to support their student lifestyle in a different country. This was the first time I was away from England for more than a couple of weeks, having to immerse myself into another culture. It was of course a little daunting as I missed my family and friends, combined with the unfamiliarity of these two cities, and worrying constantly about making grammatical errors in speech. Once I had made my own diverse group of friends and regained confidence, life abroad became easy and enjoyable.

My first graduate role was in international sales for a small company based in Yorkshire, specialising in exports to France, Germany, Ireland and Spain: a prime example of an SME that relies on free trade with our neighbours. Cold-calling was not really my strong point, and I struggled to gain an interest in the pest-control products we were manufacturing, but I got to travel on a monthly basis to visit clients across Europe, which was very exciting and helped me progress my cross-cultural communication skills, from conversational to being used in a business context. It was at this point that I felt the need to study at postgraduate level, in order to broaden my professional horizons.

In 2015, I enrolled in a three-part multilingual master’s degree in European & International Business Management at the Universidad de Deusto (Spain), Audencia Nantes Business School (France) and Bradford School of Management (United Kingdom). I focussed on marketing, combining my expertise in business development with the best of my creative side. My EU citizenship has allowed me to study and work throughout Europe without any bureaucracy constraints; I have seen the difficulties imposed on classmates coming from East Asia, North Africa and Latin America when it came to dealing with an exhausting visa process.

I also experienced this stress first-hand when completing a short internship in Shanghai (China), which led onto working for one year in a Hong Kong law firm. I did find, however, that being in possession of an EU passport was very useful for travelling around the Asia-Pacific region, enabling me to discover cultures, try new foods and make everlasting friendships.

My EU citizenship has allowed me to study and work throughout Europe without any bureaucracy constraints

I have worked in various parts of the world since obtaining my masters, notably at a Scandinavian bank based in Luxembourg. I am delighted to say that, thanks to my EU citizenship, professional experiences, education and passion for multiculturalism, I landed my dream job of working for the European Commission last year, the civil service of the European Union. As a communications officer I liaise with the press and share news on the benefits that EU investment has brought each of its Member States, in an attempt to set the record straight at a time when one cannot always rely on the media to be accurate.

Personally, I have never been particularly patriotic, as I find it difficult to be proud of something that happened purely by chance. Even though my dual-nationality gave me some grief during my upbringing, I feel that it has provided me with a competitive advantage over my peers.

As well as the freedom to live, travel, study, work and later retire in any EU country, I am currently cohabiting with my Canadian partner in Brussels (Belgium), another right I enjoy as an EU citizen.  I am thankful for my EU citizenship, and believe in the ideals of the European Union at a time when protectionism is increasingly worshipped and isolation is celebrated. My EU citizenship is part of my core identity. It is who I am, and without it, I probably would not have moved out of my hometown, a feeling that chills me to the bone. EU citizenship makes falling in love and living together across borders something we can celebrate rather than fear.

Born into a bilingual Franco-British household, Olivier was raised in a multicultural context, an environment that provided him with a passion to discover the world outside England in the years to come. His goal is to learn all he can on the benefits of EU membership, from its investment schemes to citizens’ rights and freedoms, and share this information with his friends and family back home.

Cheaper calls and Emergency Alerts

From 16 May 2019 EU citizens will be better protected. The EU is putting in place a Public Warning System that will allow authorities to push essential information about threats to citizens via their mobile phones. This is also referred to as “Reverse 112” (112 is the number to call in any EU member state in an emergency), this system will be used whenever a natural disaster or terrorist act takes place so people know what to do to avoid dangers.

The purpose of this system having the technie name of European Electronic Communications Code (EECC), is to communicate information regarding potential hazards (man-made or natural) to EU citizens via their phones, through a geolocalised message-sending technology. This type of warning should allow citizens to evacuate or avoid a danger zone more quickly thereby reducing the chances of casualties.

This came as a result of two EU committees – the ITRE (Industry, Research & Energy) and the IMCO (Internal Market & Consumer Protection) working with the mobile phone companies throughout the Union to push alerts, be they a natural disaster like a flood, tsunami or volcanic eruptions, or man made like terrorism directly to mobile phones in the area concerned.

This comes in the middle of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction in Geneva. ‘We must respond to today’s challenges, but also think about the risks of tomorrow. The citizens of this world expect their leaders to act, and we simply can not bear the cost of inaction. EU is convinced that the implementation of an effective disaster risk reduction policy is essential to adapt to the effects of climate change and to face new emerging risks,’ said Christos Stylianides, Commissioner for Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Management, in a statement today on behalf of the European Union and its Member States.

Cheaper calls to other EU countries as of 15 May

Because the EU is a single market the digital realm is part of what we call the Digital Single Market. So on 15 June 2017 Roaming charges ended in the European Union. And now from 16 May 2019 the EU has fixed a maximum amount you can be charged for calling another EU country!

The maximum charge will be €0.19 (+ VAT) a minute for calls to another EU country, and a maximum of €0.06 (+ VAT) per SMS sent to another EU country. That’s not when you’re traveling and therefore roaming, that’s when you’re in your home country and calling another EU country.

The maximum price is only for personal use, i.e., for private customers. Business customers are excluded from this price regulation. So this really is the EU working for citizens rather than just a trading block!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVEl4_57vY0

So what happens if your mobile company is not behaving? If you think your mobile company has not respected your roam like at home rights or is charging you too much to call another EU country the first thing to do is to contact your mobile phone company and use the complaint procedure in place to contest these extra charges. But, if you are not satisfied with the response you can contact the relevant national regulatory authorities in your country, usually, your national telecoms regulator who will resolve your case.

Friends will be Friends

     
This is a video from A4E: 30 Artists from all 28 EU member states performing the iconic anthem of friendship. Many voices, one important message: #vote4friendship at the EU elections May 23rd-26th.
 
Don’t just sing along. If you agree that we are best when united in all our diversity; if you agree that hate and separation are not answers but threats; if you agree that Europe at its core is about friendship: Spread the word and share our video message.
 
And most importantly: Vote in this EU election because Europe needs us!
 
We’re not affiliated with Alliance4Europe, but support many of it’s activities.  Alliance4Europe is a politically independent institution, supporting various initiatives against the many bad influences on Europe. We stand for friendship across borders. Because the forces that divide us will never be as strong as those that unite us. That is why we celebrate European friendship and unity ahead of the elections in May. And A4E is their pan-European all-star band. United in diversity. Friends will be friends.

Young people embrace a united Europe

One idea which has been flying around a lot in the last few years is that of the ‘digital native’. Young people who have grown up in the age of computers and smartphones, and who take any new technology in their stride. But I think that youth today are also intuitively comfortable with another important concept – that of a united Europe.

Those of us fortunate enough to be born in the twilight years of intra-European cooperation see the impact of such a union in every part of our lives. We have done Erasmus exchanges on the continent, we enjoy delicious food from all parts of Europe, and go on holiday there to escape the terrible British weather. We are entrepreneurs trading with the huge European market, artists collaborating with European talent, and so much more. Europe is not simply a geographical or political region; it is something we live and breathe every day.

And the fact of the matter is that this unprecedented integration, accessibility and teamwork is in large part due to the European Union. Visas and work permits are a thing of the past – those wanting to see the Colosseum or join a Dutch startup can do so with less hassle than ever, all thanks to the Treaty of Rome. Looking to import a BMW, Belgian beer or sell British-made products in Europe? All possible with no paperwork due to EU regulation.

Photo from Canonbury Primary School website

Aside from these more general benefits, it is also important to remember the value of the EU closer to home. In my borough of Islington alone, the examples are endless – £15,000 to Canonbury Primary School to improve language skills, £380,000 to help the Shadow Robot Company innovate high-tech surgical tools, or even £160,000 to fund Aedas Architects’ development of more terrorist-proof buildings.

The value of this investment in our local communities, combined with the benefits of the European single market, is far greater than what we contribute to the EU. It’s not for nothing that all the economists think leaving this arrangement is madness!

But no matter the benefits they derive from European integration, many young people today are not doing battle for their right to maintain this, or shape how it will look in the future. British youth are overwhelmingly against Brexit, but only 19% of them voted for an MEP in 2014. How can this be? Do we not want our voices to be heard?

Democratic participation is increasingly important today, as our hard-won freedoms and rights come under threat from an onslaught of misinformation and lies. A golden opportunity to take action is coming up soon, with the European elections on May 26 looming ever closer. We must seize this chance with both hands; as if we don’t fight for our own future, there definitely won’t be anyone else to do it for us.

ian-profile

Ian Sowden 19 years old.  He is standing as an independent candidate MEP in the 2019 European Parliament election. 

  • Photo of Sarajevo International University from Storyblocks

Copyright protection for EU citizens

Are the EU intending to ban memes, as had been claimed with the new draft copyright directive? The answer is a resounding no. It’s about as close to the truth as the now infamous myth that the EU was banning bent bananas!    

Nearly 10% of the working population in the EU are employed in the arts or media. It’s a major employer and these creative people are seeing the large internet platforms like Facebook, YouTube and others using their material without paying for it.

In reality it is the EU protecting EU citizens from the abuses of major corporations!

The draft directive intends to make large internet platforms like Facebook, YouTube etc to pay creators of content such as artists, musicians, news houses and their journalists what is genuinely owed to them. Performers need more than just a stage now to make a living.

The expectation is that the draft directive will push the online platforms to finally roll out a policy to fairly remunerate all those from whose work they make their money. It is therefore entirely reasonable to introduce regulation to social media. It will not target the ordinary user.

The goal to be achieved by this Directive is not to ban memes as has been wrongly reported in order to make the EU look bad. The goal and rather boring reason but very important reason is to stop online platforms from earning money  from content created by other people without fairly compensating them.

There is no requirement to have in place ‘upload filters’ which are currently already being used. If these become abused as a result of the Directive it will be the fault of the platform providers. The parody clause will protect our rights such as being able to share memes and GIFs in our typical everyday situations. The platform providers will have to put in place effective complaint procedures that we can use to complain and challenge a decision to take down a meme.

You need only go to the draft text at Article 17 (formally the infamous Article 13) paragraph 7 which requires Member States of the EU to ensure that users i.e. us can rely on the already existing exceptions and limitation originally found in an older Directive (2001/29/EC) which allows for user generated content for the purposes of for example caricature, parody or pastiche.    

Nor is it about censorship! Censorship is not the goal of this legislation. Companies must pay for the material they use to make a profit from; which is entirely reasonable.  

‘All this means that users will have the right to post parodies and criticize and quote from others’ content, and that platforms cannot unduly prevent this. If they do—for instance, if they overblock—they might find themselves in a position in which they are financially liable toward users for infringing their rights. In this sense, the expression “censorship machine” seems hardly to capture the essence of what is now Article 17 of the directive: Users will have rights that they could enforce against platforms that would unduly “censor” their speech.’

Is this just the EU’s reaction to Brexit?

Although this directive predates Brexit, that event and other events around the EU have highlighted the need for this directive.

The spread of misinformation did undoubtedly contribute to the UK vote to leave the EU. Had this directive been in place the result might have been different. The negative reporting (a lot of it online, like on YouTube) about the EU has been fuelled further with the controversy of this Copyright Directive. It is not perfect but when you look into the detail it is very easy to see that the EU possesses no malice intent towards us the citizens of the EU like many would like you to believe. When presented with the facts – the real news finds its way. This will protect EU citizens rather than make their life more difficult.

Joel Baccas can be contacted hereImages used under license from Storyblocks.